Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lineage of Alma the Younger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Lineage of Alma the Younger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Identical case to Articles for deletion/Lineage of Ether. From that discussion: "This has no secondary sources and reads like religious history homework more than a summary of a notable topic." Also, "As the nominee indicates, this subject has no secondary sources outside of apologists. Unlike the Genealogy of Jesus, there is little information outside of the Book of Mormon in regards to these individuals. Any possibly noteworthy information can be merged to other articles." and "per WP:NOR." The consensus of that discussion was to delete, and all of those arguments are applicable here as well. Trevdna (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. It doesn't appear to be notable. StephenMacky1 (talk) 18:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I've had a search for secondary sources supporting this genealogy and can't find any, even within faith-based writing. Klbrain (talk) 06:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - there is an allegation of non-notability in the article itself: "a series of minor characters". Bearian (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.