Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ling Chi Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Ling Chi Records

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

WP:N Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * >Please do not delete this page. Wiki pages are a work in progress, always.  Ctk986 (talk) 08:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have seen other pages with less stay up. Ctk986 (talk) 08:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable, no news coverage per .  Eagles   24/7  (C)  12:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --  Eagles   24/7   (C)  12:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Popularity among the media doesn't make something Notable. Ctk986 (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Popularity among the media does make something verifiable, as we need that if we're going to have an article about it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * @Andrew: by those terms, something with thousands of followers and fans (ie myspace, facebook, twitter) make something notable. social networking is a form of media, and the topic is very popular. Ctk986 (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete no coverage per my original SD tag. C T J F 8 3  chat 16:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * NOTICE: There has been more external links added, in the description of the label, as to how the name was derived.Ctk986 (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. No substantial coverage in third party sources, and a roster of non-notable bands. Essentially spam. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ^^ I contest that most recent comment based on biased opinions of metal and notability. The bands that this user created articles on are unknown and a genre thats not compatible with the genre that this label represents.  do not delete. Ctk986 (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ctk986, your opinion has by now been heard; there's no need to pile on. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources about this record label, and thus failing GNG. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  14:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Resource added Hails and Horns Magazine (sister publication of AMP Mag) interviewed Oh No! The Afterlife and Oh No! The Afterlife mentioned the label which corresponds to something in the wiki. Do not delete 67.163.217.188 (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment That is nowhere near enough to establish notability. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

^^ again, Blackmetalbaz, you have a biased opinion, please do not comment on this discussion again. H&HMag is a national magazine-- recently interviewing Black Sabbath, Sick of It All, All That Remains and more. It's notable. 67.163.217.188 (talk) 13:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment You have missed the point, I'm afraid. The article added does indeed mention that the band have signed to the label, but nothing more. No-one appears to be claiming that the label doesn't exist, simply that there is no claim for its notability. The mention in the article is trivial mention, and not enough to pass WP:GNG. This is not an issue of bias, simply one of not seeing any reliable sources out there. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.