Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingeburghe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was enough already, speedy delete as "obviously ridiculous hoax" = vandalism. At least try and use some plausible French city names. ~ trialsanderrors 05:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Lingeburghe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article text is entirely identical to. The content is unsourced, and I found less than 100 nonwiki ghits. Fails WP:N and WP:OR by a mile. YechielMan 00:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyvio. - Denny 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment the external link you provided appears to be a mirror. The page is almost certainly not a copyvio. --- RockMFR 00:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G12 (copyvio); so tagged. --Dennisthe2 00:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it can be rewritten and given contextual reason for notibility. Maybe transfer to Wiktionary.--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 00:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Possibly delete, no speedy, the link above is a WP mirror. ~ trialsanderrors 00:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, nevermind, speedy as blatant vandahoaxlism is fine. ~ trialsanderrors 01:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pernom--Hu12 05:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No non-mirror ghits; tale is improbable and inconsistent. --Askari Mark (Talk) 05:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.