Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinguaLeo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no arguments for delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

LinguaLeo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable WP:CORP Deunanknute (talk) 06:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator found more sources
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * As a matter of fact, I came here thinking I might find a erroneous argument for deletion. So it is :( First of all, LinguaLeo is not a website, it's a language learning system, IOW, it's a complex of apps for English-learners. I suppose native speakers of English underestimate the notabily of LL because they are not a target group. But in Russia, Brazil and Turkey Lingualeo is very popular, especially in Russia (10M users). The service was gazed many times by Forbes, Vedomosti, Kommersant and RBC Information Systems[RBK. All references are well formated. Finally I may take o look at a big russian version of LL's article and its |popularity. --Gruznov (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (pronounce)  @ 20:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.