Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linguakat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Linguakat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Paucity of comprehensive independent secondary sources to establish notability and satisfy WP:MUSIC Wisdom89 ♦talk 22:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Wisdom89 ♦talk 22:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Wisdom89 ♦talk 22:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Questionably solidly notable as mentioned. SwisterTwister   talk  23:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per BLP1E. --QEDK ( T &#128214;  C ) 11:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Because the article makes quite a few assertions of the artist's influence, which I extended to importance. Wisdom89 ♦talk 14:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Covered by one third-party source (two links are dead). I'm sorry for skimming over it. Falls under BLP1E. --QEDK ( T &#128214;  C ) 15:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination - one of several promotional articles by same creator on non-notable new-musicians, evidently created by an employee of their label, Owia Music. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.