Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link Between Enlightenment and Imperialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Link Between Enlightenment and Imperialism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a high school essay and not an encyclopedia article, largely based on WP:SYNTH and mostly unsourced. Tried draftifying it but was instantly recreated. So, WP:NOT. Praxidicae (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete – Students need better wiki training; the exact same thing that will get you Honors props in college or a fellowship afterward (e.g., completely original work that breaks new ground) is completely off-limits here, and some of the students, perhaps understandably, have difficulty understanding the difference. For those interested in previous history of the article, it can be viewed here . Mathglot (talk) 04:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * To be fair, I think it's less about the students since this seems to be a very frequent problem among dozens of classes and more on wiki-ed itself but that's a conversation for another place ;) Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:NOTESSAY. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify: I doubt this article will get off the ground in its current state because WP:NOTESSAY, but maybe the author can render it into something useful at a future date, if not the draft process will time it out and delete it when appropriate.Ethanpet113 (talk) 03:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note This article seems to have been part of a student's course work, the course will conclude on the 7th of December 2018, after which they are unlikely to return to it, especially given its current encyclopedic quality.Ethanpet113 (talk) 04:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.