Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link Lock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 13:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Link Lock

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No substantive coverage found on a search. The URL for the magazine article no longer goes to a magazine, but even if we assume that was substantive coverage, one source is not sufficient to indicate notability. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. No substantial coverage from reliable sources, not really notable. BMB YT 500000 (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree unless better sources could be found. It was not unsalvageable enough for a speedy. Deb (talk) 13:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet any notability guideline.Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.