Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link Madness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  Dei zio  talk 16:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Link Madness
"Link madness" appears to be a neologism; the discussion is unencyclopedic, and appears to include original research ("The only way to escape such an affliction is to let the obsession run its course"). Anirvan 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's a neologism, it violates WP:NOR, and it's simply not particularly encyclopedic (not to mention being made up). -- Kicking222 19:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. DarthVad e r 22:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Richardcavell 23:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.