Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link bait


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nomination withdrawn. --Aaron 01:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Link bait
Article fails WP:V - only sources are blogs, none of which are reliable sources. Article itself appears to be a thinly-veiled promotion, as the author included a link to his own blog (seoegghead.com) early on:, and. --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Update: somehow I missed the final reference to searchenginewatch.com, which may be a WP:RS. I'll leave this open though to see what others think though. --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Update 2: Color me embarassed: another source (Matt Cutts) is one of the big guys at Google. Looks like this article just needs a little cleanup. I withdraw my nom. for this article. --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.