Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linkin Park Underground


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   selective merge to Linkin Park discography. There seems to be a rough split between those calling for deletion and those calling for a merge (I'm including Startstop's comments in the latter), so I'm defaulting to the option that keeps the most comment. The comments in favor of keeping the article were largely discounted, as they did not provide any evidence demonstrating that the article is sufficiently notable for standalone inclusion. -- jonny - m t  07:28, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Linkin Park Underground

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fan club. No third-party, reliable sources provided, none found. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, no reliable source and no notability established.-- S R X  14:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: although it looks as if a lot of work was put into the creation of this article, much of the content could be incorporated into one of the Linkin Park articles (band article or discography articles) already established. There is no sources aside from the fan club Web site, which is not a reliable or 3rd party source.--Startstop123 (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable fan club --T-rex 15:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't delete - definitely notable fan club, even though the article needs some work; plus the article serves as a list for the exclusive EPs (even more important reason to keep it, in my opinion). Anrod (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Fans of the group and members of the group certainly consider it notable, but that is a moot point. To be notable in wikipedia's terms, we need substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. The article doesn't provide that and I haven't been able to find any. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Linkin Park discography. The albums are worth noting. Green  Runner  0  20:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to Linkin Park discography. The EPs are from linkin park, so they need noting on the discography section, but the rest is written like an advertisment for the "club" and needs to be deleted. Tavix (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The albums are all worth noting, but there is too much information to merge. And it is too important to delete. It is a high-importance article in the Linkin Park WikiProject. Tezkag72 (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 01:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.