Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LioD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

LioD

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Unreferenced article, possibly original research. Cannot find reliable source to support content. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 11:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unsupported by any reliable sources. The concept may be a bad translation of something Swedish, but given the material we have here, it is impossible to determine. -- Whpq (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be a hoax, or some kind of private joke. /Julle (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.