Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Parcel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lion Air Group. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Lion Parcel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NORG was also speedily deleted earlier Aoyoigian (talk) 07:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Aoyoigian (talk) 07:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability, the one source (translated) barely proves that the entity exists never mind giving in-depth coverage JW 1961 Talk 08:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No Deleted : The article is being rework from previous version. The article is the support article since Lion Parcel is a division of Lion Air Group aswell. Deleted now means does not give a time from improvement for the article. NaidNdeso (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect To Lion Air Group since this clearly isn't notable. Divisions of companies hardly ever are. Given that it is one though, I'm fine with it being directed to the main article until a time in the future when it's notable. But currently, it's clearly an unnecessary fork of the other article. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article was dubious to begin with, and the material ("environment record)  recently added by  has made it a good deal worse.  NN, do you have any coi to declare?  I'm not surethatevena redirect is justified.    DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough citations to justify a keep. Chelokabob (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lion Air Group as Adamant1 has suggested. The company surely exists and has an arguably large-scale operation in Indonesia, however I don't think a separate page could be justified. The article's content is spartan as is and has claims that can be seen as advertisement-like, and I'd imagine it would be difficult to expand on it. Best just to just redirect to Lion Air Group. Mugimeshi (talk) 11:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.