Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lions Clubs International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Lions Clubs International
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Daask (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Queried speedy delete. Lions Clubs International is widely known. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep needs to take a WP:SOFIXIT approach rather than getting anywhere close to speedy deletion; there's WP:ADVERT concerns for sure but absolutely no need to delete. Known service organization and critical non-profit. Personally I would have ignored and warned per WP:BURO but it's good to build the consensus to take it to AfD.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Absolutely no need to get rid of this. Good article on notable subject. Ultimograph5 (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep very well known and notable. Tillerh11 (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. No merit in argument for deletion. Clearly notable. --Michig (talk) 06:33, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. 100-yo service organization with chapters all over creation. The article should be made more encyclopedic, but it is not so egregious as to merit deletion. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.