Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liontooth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Pigman ☿ 03:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Liontooth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication of notability, no independent sources. Fails WP:BK. Was prodded, prod removed by author without significant improvement. Huon (talk) 10:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not assert notability, and has no independent references. --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 10:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. commercial promotion of an non notable book. Teapotgeorge (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:BK  Gtstricky Talk or C 15:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment According to this book's product description on Amazon, it was reviewed by Country Living, The Lady and The English Garden. I haven't been able to track down full online copies of these reviews and so I can't be sure whether they are non-trivial (i.e. do they extend beyond the excerpts given?); but if they are then this would pass WP:BK. -- KittyRainbow (talk) 00:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.