Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lip­smackin­thirst­quenchin­acetastin­motivatin­good­buzzin­cool­talkin­high­walkin­fast­livin­ever­givin­cool­fizzin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deletethissocalledlongestwordvanityspamcruftarticleoffthefaceofwikipedia. Mailer Diablo 00:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Lip­smackin­thirst­quenchin­acetastin­motivatin­good­buzzin­cool­talkin­high­walkin­fast­livin­ever­givin­cool­fizzin
Just because it's a long advertising slogan doesn't mean it deserves an article. It will be a perma-stub and it can be mentioned in the Longest word in English article instead. Nobody will find this article anyway.--Zxcvbnm 00:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Con  D  e  m Talk 00:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ditto. Keppa 00:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 00:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi-Cola GT 01:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. banta 01:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; there was some actual information at the similar article for McDonald's, but this article doesn't hint at anything interesting to say. Melchoir 01:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Longest word in English per nom.--– sampi ( talk • contrib • email ) 01:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Just looking at the title gives me a headache. 23skidoo 01:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Longest word in English - the merge has apparently already taken place, as this information exists in that article. --Hyperbole 02:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bige1977
 * Delete per all above. --Arnzy (Talk) 05:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. SorryGuy 06:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Articles like this shouldn't be brought to AfD. Redirects are cheap and can be created simply by being bold. NoIdeaNick 07:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Longest word in English.-- blue 520  07:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't understand redirecting this to Longest word in English. Does anyone seriously believe that the result of stringing 15 words together like this creates a new word that is among the longest in the English language? I think this was just an ad campaign not meant to be taken seriously and that neither Pepsi's intention nor the effect of their campaign was that a new vocabulary term was created. GT 08:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you questioning the proposed redirect or that the word and a small amount of info are included in the Other long words section of Longest word in English?-- blue 520  08:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Both I guess. Personally I wouldn't put words in that article that aren't real words but that's just my preference. GT 09:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi-Cola. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 09:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi, obviously. Just zis Guy you know? 10:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This should certainly not be redirected to Longest word in English since it is - not a word! GT is quite right. One could redirect this to Pepsi, but who is going to type in this striong in the first place...? Eusebeus 11:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No point in redirect, nobody will ever use it as a search term, and the only link to this page is FROM the Longest Words in English page. --Maelwys 11:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a valid word. And as already mentioned, nobody will ever search for it anyways. --Bolasanibk 12:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Longest word in English. --Ter e nce Ong 13:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Longest word in English.--Jusjih 13:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Maelwys. Colon el Tom 14:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't imagine anyone searching for this, or spelling it the same way twice.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no merge, not even a mention at Longest word in English. NO ADVERTISING on Wikipedia, period! Angr (talk • contribs) 17:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense, nn, and it's not even a word M1ss1ontomars2k4 19:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi-Cola, mention on Longest word in English. --AlexWCovington  (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with no redirect. Brian G. Crawford 23:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ad  Funky Monkey   (talk)  01:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi. VegaDark 04:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: nonsense, hoax, neologism, advertising, unverifiable. Invoke Ignore all rules if necessary. (Unless of course some can cite an instance that someone actually used the 'word' in conversation without being paid to.) Peter Grey 04:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete way too long. it's not even a word. M1ss1ontomars2k4 06:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TH 08:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, no evidence in article it was an actual ad campaign.  Шизомби 14:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete"" per nom. This doesn't appear to be a legit campaign either. :: Colin Keigher 00:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Google shows that apart from this article Wikipedia and its mirrors, the only other top hits are mostly message board postings.  Is this a hoax?  WC Quidditch   &#9742;  &#9998;  17:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pepsi-Cola.--Cini 19:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't warrand a separate article. Mukadderat 17:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.