Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipcon, Margulies, and Winkleman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex / Rational 21:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Lipcon, Margulies, and Winkleman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP, no significant coverage of the firm itself. Similar to many articles about lawyers, the problem is that notability for the firm is not inherited from coverage about lawsuits it was a part of, or from quotes about other topics attributed to the firm's lawyers. ~ A412  talk! 20:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies,  and Florida. ~  A412  talk! 20:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per @A412. Just a self-promoting non-notable law firm. Nirva20 (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree that they fail WP:NCORP and this is really just an article about a law firm doing its expected job. Editing84 (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Leaning delete per User:Bearian/Standards. It has had lots of newsworthy lawsuits, but little about the law firm or its partners. My essay is not policy, so try to convince me otherwise. Bearian (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.