Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipoexpediency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Lipogenesis. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Lipoexpediency

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lipoexpediency is not a commonly-used term. Lipoexpediency is not even an uncommonly-used term. It originated as a clever turn-of-phrase in the title of a decade-old journal article and has been used only a small handful of times since, either in reference to that article or by members of the team that coined it. Marchantiophyta (talk) 02:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with Lipogenesis: not a common term, but appears enough in academic literature to be a likely search term, and redirects are cheap. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge as OwenX suggested. A contrast with the well-known "lipotoxicity" makes this a plausible search term but it's not substantial enough for its own article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.