Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid Fire (band) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete by User:Nyttend, as G4: Recreation of deleted material: Only differences from previous edition were some spelling corrections. (Non-admin closure) Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Liquid Fire (band)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm contesting the A7 here. This page seems a bit too detailed for an A7 in my opinion, and it contains very vague assertations so I feel A7 is a stretch. Still fails WP:MUSIC tho. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment A page with the same name was deleted on June 26. Is this a G4? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hard to judge this article for notability without any sources. It's certainly not the best-written article in the 'pedia, but it's far from the worst either. Frank  |  talk  01:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.