Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid Fuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Liquid Fuse

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability. Some of the "references" don't mention Liquid Fuse, others make bare passing mention, or are non-reliable, or not independent or promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not only is there no assertation of reliability, the article seems like it was put there purely for promotion, and is incomplete. The main author Liquidfuseofficial not only appears to have a COI, but has made the article into a template to be completed later. The only reservation I have is that this article was only made 5 hours before going up for AfD. He's Gone Mental 16:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Maybe someday they will be notable, but they aren't today.  Links to their iTunes and such do not verify notability, only that they made a recording and are trying to sell it.  Dennis Brown (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per the above rationales. No significant coverage in reliable sources found; subject does not appear to meet WP:BAND at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 05:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.