Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lireo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus for deletion. Merging can always be discussed outside AFD if need be. MuZemike 01:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Lireo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. There is no reason for subjects like this one to be spin-out.  JL 09  q? c|undefined 12:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Additionals
I nominate these articles for the same reason:

Furthermore, these articles, and the ones I listed before, are collection of pure original research.-- JL 09  q? c|undefined 12:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the ones that are combination articles, consider the others individually for merging  lists of minor characters & locations are always  good  to keep, if the work is at all significant and there are enough characters. Similarly for list of locations,.  Whether Genealogy ..  and Timeline ... duplicate other articles needs to be checked by someone who knows the work. Not OR, for the information can be gotten from the work itself, which is a RS for most of this material.    DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 01:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all no notability, significantly WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 14:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  — ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 14:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, into the main article regarding the show. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, into the main article regarding the show. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * As for as Enchanta goes, it certainly fulfills the criteria for an article about a constructed/fictional language to have an article. It should therefore not merely be treated as an extension of the fictional world (which I'm completely unfamiliar with). That doesn't mean the article is acceptable as it looks now, but it deserves separate treatment. As for the other articles discussed, I have no opinion about them. &mdash;IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu?  14:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.