Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Backwell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Skins (TV series).  MBisanz  talk 23:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Lisa Backwell

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep. The actress plays a notable character on a notable television series.Broadweighbabe (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Skins (TV series). Subject lacks sufficient reliable source coverage to justify an independent article, and her only notability is in the context of her sole significant role on the aforementioned TV series.  Article can be re-established as a stand-alone once her career develops further; when she has another significant role she will satisfy WP:ENTERTAINER.  Baileypalblue (talk) 06:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Starring in a notable, award-winning TV series by past consensus establishes notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not transferable. Would need to prove this person is notable, not that the TV show was notable. A single role on a single program in a single season is pretty nonnotable for an actres. Maybe some day she will meet our criteria, but it's not there yet. A redirect could work also. DreamGuy (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:Creative. Her only acting roles as Pandora in "Skins" is not a "significant roles". Untick (talk) 04:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.