Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Burns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Ponyo, CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Lisa Burns

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am bundling the deletion for both sisters together because of their joint roles and because I could not find anything distinguishing either from the other in the future.

These sisters only played a role in The Shining and before that a one-episode appearance in Kids. This is not enough to meet the notability guidelines for actors which requires significant roles in multiple media. After this, they both retired to become a lawyer and a scientist. The subjects also do not meet the general notability guidelines because there is not in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. There is an interview with the Daily Mail and some articles saying "what do they look like now?", but those are only applicable to notability for one event, and are not enough to write a verifiable biographical article about their lives and careers.

Lastly the articles should be salted due to continuous recreation despite having been speedy deleted multiple times before without any changes to indicate notability. Opencooper (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt Fails WP:GNG, WP:ENT, and WP:NACTOR. As they retired, no additional notability is expected.  Scr ★ pIron IV 16:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt Several previous speedy deletions should have been sufficient to stop the need for this AFD but, as we are here, in no way shape manner or form do these articles meet WP:GNG. A TV show and A film still qualify as WP:ONEEVENT. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note should this AFD result in salting it would be a good idea - considering the continual recreation by the editor - to salt these as well. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I've deleted the articles under CSD G5 as they were created by a sock account. I've salted the various titles as well. Please let me know if I missed any of them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.