Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Cant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Lisa Cant

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Declining speedy. What are the notability requirements for models? Just WP:BIO? Elevating for discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I assume WP:ENTERTAINER should be used in case of models. Following the corresponding notability criteria, there appear to be sources to establish notability (coverage in several industry-related reliable sources accessible via Google News and Books). Furthermore, it represents a stub and is under experts attention of WP:BIOG, WP:FASHION. Zhernovoi (talk) 11:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete WP:ENTERTAINER is the correct guideline to use, however she doesn't appear to pass it.   talk 17:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Non notable student model with zero references.  Teapot  george Talk  14:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.