Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. In view of the low participation, this is a WP:SOFTDELETE; as with a PROD, the article will be restored on request at WP:REFUND, but may then be renominated. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Lisa Chen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable public relations executive, fails WP:BIO; no independent sourcing and relies almost entirely on original research no doubt supplied by the subject of the article. Lack of sourcing was tagged three years ago but none has yet been supplied, indicative of a probable lack of independent sourcing required to meet notability requirement. A review of the contributions of the account that created this article indicates a conflict of interest, as does the user page (see User:Haley113). Jay Tepper (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any sourcing beyond the promotional material in the article. Shadowjams (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note - The author of this page also created The She Spot, which was cowritten by the subject of this article. Shadowjams (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have placed appropriate tags on the article and nominated it for deletion. Jay Tepper (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  01:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.