Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Craig Gautier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JodyBtalk 12:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Lisa Craig Gautier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although referenced, I doubt that this person rises to the level of notability that should result in an own article. Dirk Beetstra T C 03:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article was created by a WP:SPA whose sole contributions have been this article and an attempted article about her husband (there's still a draft of the husband's article, but when it was moved to main space, it was deleted per A7). Lisa's article was tagged as an A7 by an IP, and although it was a dreadful article, I didn't feel comfortable deleting it and declined the speedy. However, I then hacked (no other word for it) almost all of the unsourced sections from the article, leaving what remains now. If you look at the history, you'll easily be able to see the earlier version. Also, the SPA attempted to reinsert the same messy material but was correctly reverted by the nominator here. This is all for background as I am not voting.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. It's funny that they created articles about her and her husband, neither of whom are notable, but apparently have never tried to create an article about their nonprofit group, Matter of Trust, which might be notable. --MelanieN (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.