Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Hensley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Lisa Hensley
The result was Speedy Keep ; nomination withdrawn, article substantially improved.  Horologium  (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)}}


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I know the page was just moved into the main space but I don't think it looks ready. MajorMinorMark (talk) 02:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You sure about that? DS (talk) 02:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Damn buddy, I just created the AfD seconds before you rehauled the article. MajorMinorMark (talk) 02:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's up to you - keep the AfD going, or close it now? DS (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Buckets of apparently significant coverage when you Google for "lisa hensley microbiologist", plus the article is very new with its creator actively working on it. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Technically, the creator's not working on it. She hasn't touched it since June '09; I found it while doing a sweep for inappropriate uses of userspace (spam, etc), and decided it was just about ready for mainspace already. So I moved it out into mainspace, then set about trimming it... and got edit-conflicted by the AfD. As an admin, I'm definitely not used to having articles I work on being AfD'd! DS (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, h-index of about 23, smattering of News and Books hits, and this. Abductive  (reasoning) 09:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, definitely notable. Kcordina Talk 09:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks OK to me, it's simple and NPOV and appears to be adequately sourced. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above, the nominator could just withdraw now to save face. JBsupreme (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've asked the nominator for precisely that. Nominating the article for deletion was Majorminormark's second edit ever, so I'm assuming that he is unfamiliar with the process. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Withdrawing: Feel free to close this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MajorMinorMark (talk • contribs) 21:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.