Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa L. Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete (2k/6d). Mindmatrix 16:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Lisa L. Miller
Does not appear verifiably notable. The article claims she is nationally famous but fails to back this up. Weak delete. Stifle 11:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, classic schoolchild vanity. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 11:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, vanity --Mecanismo 11:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a nn-bio. Joyous | Talk 12:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * KeepLOL She was my old debate coach from my HS days 9-10 years ago! Hysterical!  She's (statewide) well known debate coach and teacher for MANY years, past president of th Florida Forensic League, her teams always do well in EVERY event, which lends to her reputation.  Every active HS debate coach in the state and, possibly, in the region has heard and, likely, has come in contact with her or her teams.   She's loved by her students (past and present).  I'm bias, but I'd say she's notable enough (barely) to say in.Gator (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Around 4p CST Friday, Evinem put up a couple vanity bios. He was removing db tags and being a total ass. This article is a continuation of those two articles, which focused on the debate team et cetera. Mecanismo is dead on; this is vanity. Especially since there's a _notable_ person by that name. (I know the "don't bite the newbies" policy; however, this guy was asking to be bitten.) AND ON TOP OF THAT, Evinem has AGAIN attempted to remove vfd tags! D.valued 12:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment the fact that a wikipedia's user knows the said person and admires her doesn't justify an encyclopedia article on that said person. We all know people we admire but that doesn't earn them the right to be listed in an encyclopedia --Mecanismo | Talk 15:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment Now now, I never said keep her because I admitred her, I said keep (barely) because I blieve she is notably apart from my own biases. I didn't like your implication.  I know what notable is and I would never vote keep just because "a wikipedia's user knows the said person and admires her."  Please re-read my comments.  Delete or don't, it's no skin off my back.Gator (talk) 13:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gator as Miller seems notable. If not merge somewhere. -- JJay 19:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless notability can be WP:V verified. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.