Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Lisa Love

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Zero evidence of notability. Resume comprises two minor acting parts and a middle management job at a major magazine. Mr. Darcy talk 19:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, speedy close. Page was vandalized and most content removed. By SPA "Editlove" in November. I restored the content after AFD began. Appears notable enough and sourced enough now. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Good work, but I'm not sure I see notability in there even after the restorations. The justification I offered up top still seems to apply. Mr. Darcy talk 00:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * But she's not "middle management at a magazine," but treated as a "celebrity"/notable person of sorts by the media and her industry.   . I don't know if she ought to be notable, but she gets more genuine 3d party coverage than a large number of the actors wikipedia finds notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Very weak keep based on the role in The Hills. Very weak because the listed sources in the article (except IMDB) actually raise notability questions:  #2 is a restaurant review (Ms. Love, a diner, enjoyed the black bean burger); #3 is a link to purchase the DVDs for The Hills; #4 is an internal 404 screen with a shadowy depiction of the Oscar statute; and #5 is about some event where Love showed up in her role as a magazine employee.  So the article needs improvement, but this seems like a "keep and improve" situation. Townlake (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.