Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Mahood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete Given the uncertainty around the sole source and the lack of further input.Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. However if you think you can improve this in draft space,, just let me know. Happy to provide it Star   Mississippi  03:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Lisa Mahood

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NPOL as an unsuccessful political candidate. I searched gnews and Australian search engine Trove and could not find significant coverage. Simply being a mayor is not enough to establish notability. LibStar (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women,  and Australia. Skynxnex (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Uncertain keep. I am not certain if WP:ANYBIO C3 is met. She has an entry in the Australian Women's Register  but I don't know if the register meets the WP:ANYBIO definition of a Biographical dictionary. I vote keep on assumption it is, but if it doesn't, I'll need to look into this more. CT55555 (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines set out by WP:NPOL and I don't think the register mentioned by @CT55555 meets reqs of WP:ANYBIO LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.