Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Renlund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Lisa Renlund

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't appear to meet notability requirements. Has played 45 mins in a league not listed at WP:FPL, so does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL.

In terms of WP:GNG, I was not able to locate multiple reliable sources showing significant coverage; there is one Damfotboll article (translated) but GNG requires multiple sources. Älvsbynews has passing mentions of her in match reports, such as this, this and this but such coverage does not add up to GNG. Aside from that we have the usual football databases and some Blogspot passing mentions of her.

Wikipedia is not a Soccerway mirror. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Although, I swear that the Damallsvenskan was included as fully-professional a long time ago but I guess not. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it was at one point. Most of its players pass GNG quite comfortably. The only reason Renlund doesn't is probably because she's played so little football, although, according to the one decent article, was a reasonably promising youth. Still, she has better coverage than most players that have played only 45 mins of professional sport, to be fair. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Damallsvenskan was removed from FPL and its removal is still being contested. can probably say much more on this topic. Seany91 (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah WP:FPL is unreliable . For more information, see WP:WOSO. BTW, when you're creating articles about Damallsvenkan players, add adequate content and referencing instead of just tagging your own article, eh? We wouldn't want Spiderone to delete your basic work. Hmlarson (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Going for Keep - Her first name is sometimes spelled Liza. Did a short search in Swedish sources and came up with three good articles . Alvaldi (talk) 10:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Very interesting. Clearly had much more of a career than "Lisa Renlund" searches yielded. if you're happy to change your vote, I'll close this down.  are you happy for me to move the article to Liza Renlund as per WP:COMMONNAME. Happy to start a RM discussion but it seems fairly blatant that that's her most common name and we can leave Lisa Renlund as a redirect.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Same here, go for it. And the name change too. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No objections from me, Liza seems to be used much more in regards to her. Alvaldi (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - NFOOTBALL irrelevant when GNG is met, as appears to be the case here. GiantSnowman 18:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.