Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Saad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Lisa Saad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem notable. The artist does not have a lot of press coverage. Plus no artworks in permanent collections. She has received two awards, but they don't seem to be that important. Susana Hodge (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  16:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  16:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. There is bit more than as referenced in the article; I found pretty quickly at least one main stream reliable secondary source.  Article also needs balance, I also found pretty quickly her winning one of the awards created some controversy which is available in secondary source/s.  I suggest potentially notable but perhaps TOOSOON.   Aoziwe (talk) 12:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete she may have won these awards but no notable awards and no third party coverage. Creative professionals need wider coverage like in mainstream press or major awards. She has neither.  LibStar (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.