Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Solberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Lisa Solberg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is technically ineligible for a G5, because it got hit by two different UPE socks editing in violation of their respective blocks, and technically ineligible for PROD due to being deleted by PROD before (and, before that, speedied twice).

Subject themselves does not appear significant- out all all the sources, is an interview(by which I mean it's a scan or a print-out she filled in in blue ballpoint),  is a site selling her art,  is an interview,  is from a gallery displaying her art(she was their 'Artist in Resident' at the time of publication),  mentions her once in a list,  is a link to two interviews,  is an interview,  is the same as 2 (and still selling her art),  is an interview,  is her own site,  is a video interview,  is an interview,  is about her art installation, not her,  is about her art show, not her,  and  are the same interviews earlier, this time individually linked,  is about a different artist's exhibit that she painted fireworks for(not sigcov worthy fireworks),  actually has a paragraph on her (again, not rising to sigcov),  has a whole two paragraphs (best source so far),  is an announcement of a talk she will give,  mentions her work for about two sentences (but is mostly about other artists- but also the second best source),  is about an art exhibit, not her,  and the Facebook events link is a link on Facebook for an event she planned. I have looked around for additional sources, and haven't found any that would help the subject meet the WP:GNG. And, given that there were two users blocked for likely UPE and socking looking very hard to find such sources, I don't see myself finding any they've missed.

She doesn't appear to meet WP:NARTIST, because the three pieces about her work don't show that she's widely cited or influential, gotten known for originating a new concept, theory, or technique, that she has a major work (or body of works). Her work also hasn't been incorporated into any significant monuments, significant exhibitions, been in a permanent collection or garnered much critical reception. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, California, Colorado,  and Illinois.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  08:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: No listing in the Getty ULAN and all I can find is an article in her school's paper . Source analysis above is good, I don't find anything extra we can use to keep the article. Oaktree b (talk) 12:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I suspect the photo is a copyvio, but can't find anything else on the web about it. UPE and paid promotion seem to use copyvio photos here... Oaktree b (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: doesn't meet Wikipedia notability guidelines EncyclopediaEditorXIV (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete The nomination does an excellent job laying it out and this is an easy call for deletion. Not notable. Go4thProsper (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.