Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Vann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Lisa Vann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A quick look for sources doesn't really bring up anything beyond press releases. Some exposure, but not really seeing any notability. Mabalu (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Being a founder of her own salon spa already makes her notable. Plus a lot of women buy her products, think of Loreal.--Mishae (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, it doesn't. The very fact that she has opened her own salon does not automatically make her notable. She needs independent third-party coverage on her which looks specifically at her (or at least at her salon) and is not reprinted press releases or her own publicity material, and I'm not seeing any of this. Mabalu (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sigh. Delete.--Mishae (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  16:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a few brief mentions in fashion websites, but no in-depth coverage. Lots of people own their own business, whether a salon, beauty parlor, or whatever, so that doesn't make her notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Will Hot Beauty Magazine be enough? In October 2013 she made a design which was mentioned in their September/October issue.--Mishae (talk) 22:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * It's only one source - there should ideally be at least three solid sources to demonstrate notability. I'm not sure Hot Beauty sounds like a particularly reliable source though, I had a quick look and it describes itself as the youngest beauty trade publication so probably hasn't really established itself yet. Mabalu (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sorry to say, but not notable, just a competent professional in her field.--Milowent • hasspoken 21:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.