Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Lisa Welch

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

After four years we have a two line uncited stub? Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple mainstream appearances in high-profile films. "She appeared in 1984's Revenge of the Nerds as Suzy, a sorority girl, and in 1981's History of the World: Part I as a Vestal Virgin." Dekkappai (talk) 03:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dekkappai. Dismas |(talk) 04:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per WP:PORNSTAR. Her mainstream performances definitely fit the criteria for notability and inclusion. --Morenooso (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment at Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner and elsewhere--Milowent (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Source or delete Unsourced info points to notability. Source the info or delete an unrefrenced BLP. Hipocrite (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this will be my only opinion vote on this issue, I do not think playmates belong on WP. Maybe one to five of the most notoriously covered ones (or uncovered), but not every single playmate of the year... There are no sources on this one either. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A small number of minor, mostly nameless-character film roles aren't enough to approach the WP:ENT threshold, and no sign of other coverage satisfying the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.