Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liselle Terret


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Possibly not there via WP:NPROF, but has enough coverage in general for WP:GNG. RL0919 (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Liselle Terret

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG, no evidence that the subject meets WP:NACADEMIC. When nominating for PROD, said Her highest citation count is 290, but that was for a work in which she contributed a chapter (Applied Theatre). Without that, her highest citation count is 9. However, in my own search, it appears that the book has received 290 citations--it is not clear that the chapter specifically authored by Terret was cited. DePROD by. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Her "neo-burlesque" work appears to pass GNG as notable, at first glance. See:
 * https://burdy.co/featured-act/doris-la-trine/
 * https://royalcourttheatre.com/cast/doris-la-trine/
 * Naked Exhibitionism: Gendered Performance and Public Exposure  Chapter "Cross Dressing and Grrrrly Shows".
 * All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC).


 * Keep. As a side note, citations are usually a poor indicator of academic notability in the humanities, and one has to look at other factors. In this case I feel that most of the subject's notability comes from her theatrical work, and thus she should be primarily evaluated on WP:GNG grounds. There are examples of in-depth detailed coverage of her personally and her theatrical work. E.g. pages 127-129 in this book, p. 3 in this journal article , an interview with her in this scholarly journal . The latter interview is conducted because the program she lauched, The Performance Making Diploma, won the 2015 The Guardian University Award for Student Diversity and Widening Participation. (I have added the relevant info, with refs to the article.) Overall, I think there is a reasonable case here for passing WP:GNG, taking into account the other sources already in the article. Nsk92 (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I find the first two examples provided here to be good examples of significant coverage and would now consider myself to lean keep. signed,Rosguill talk 21:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. Certainly no pass of WP:Prof. Notability will have to found elsewhere. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC).
 * Keep Like Rosguill, I am persuaded by Nsk92's findings. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - these new sources have established notability. Mujinga (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.