Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisette Cooper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 04:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Lisette Cooper

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet the WP:BIO. The lone current reference provides only superficial coverage and I was unable to find anything more substantial in third-party sources. Note that Mrs. Cooper was formerly known as "Lisette Keto". Pichpich (talk) 15:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Although clearly a smart and successful businesswoman, the only substantive reference is a human interest story about how she spends the late December holiday period. Accordingly, not notable by Wikipedia standards. Cullen328 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I personally believe that being a PhD is important and all and being a professor at an university is important and everything... BUT... First of all, WP:BIO is clear. MULTIPLE sources. Publication of an academic article IS NOT a source. Most professors publish academic articles and are not worthy of a wikipedia article. Also fails WP:ACADEMIC anyways. All statements that give some hint of notability, are unsourced. Even if they were, they still fail the professor test. Second of all, the main contributor is a contributor solely on this article... (I know this on its own is not an argument, but it is an indication. However, I know some other users are smarter about this and still write unworthy bios, sometimes their own, but manage to keep them just because they contributed in other articles to the point of receiving barnstars. Their bio is still unworthy nonetheless. But that's another topic altogether). -- Loukinho (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:ACADEMIC doesn't apply here because the assertion of notability is as a business executive, not an academic. The applicable policy is the WP:GNG, which she fails. Cullen328 (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.