Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of Gore And Perkins WWE World Heavyweight Champions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

List Of Gore And Perkins WWE World Heavyweight Champions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is a list of champions from a web show that plays video games, specifically in this case WWE '13. I originally tagged this with a CSD tag, but the tag did not apply.

In any case none of this content is remotely close to being encyclopedic, as it's simply a table for gamers playing a video game. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - would have speedied if I could have found the right criteria (A11?) but I struggled to find something that fit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I know I tagged it as A7 for web content as this was based off a nn YouTube channel, however A7 didn't apply. It's one of those weird areas where I know it's deletion worthy, just not able to pinpoint exactly where. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - doesn't serve importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy. Absolutely nothing encyclopedic about a video game results on a non-notable webshow. This is an embarrassment. oknazevad (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * None of the speedy deletion criteria apply in my view. "doesn't serve importance" is not one of the criteria. Nor is "nothing encyclopedic". However, if this is actually merely the records of a series of video game encounters, and not records of actual wrestling matches involving very notable wrestlers, then delete as lacking and demonstrated notability. Should such a web series become a matter of frequent public comment so as to pass the WP:GNG there could perhaps be an article about it, but I don't see that here. DES (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 16:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Nikki  ♥  311   03:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.