Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of Obstacles On American Ninja Warrior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

List Of Obstacles On American Ninja Warrior

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." Although descriptions of these obstacles may well be worth including, simply listing every single obstacle every time it's been used is simply a collection of indiscriminate information. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. This list originates as a section from the American Ninja Warrior article, and that list has been removed by both me and other editors for the same reason this article is up for deletion. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 14:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and batten down the hatches: Looking over the edit history of the creator, whose sole Wikipedia activity is based around the TV show, it's rife with edit warring and nasty edit summaries, so I suppose we ought to anticipate fireworks. Anyway, I agree with the nom: this is completely indiscriminate (never mind that the eye-blinding rainbow of colors used blows holes through the pertinent accessibility guidelines).  It's also completely unsourced, and I defy anyone to come up with any reliable sources independent of the show's own websites.  Wikipedia isn't a web host, and this information is better served on a fan page.  Nha Trang  Allons! 14:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as utterly, preposterously trivial. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - There wouldn't be the good amount of sources to fix this article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for all the reasons given. Let it be noted that is again, or still, edit warring to insert this tripe in the main article--where it also shouldn't be, for reasons given here. Drmies (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, the creator, and those who like that creator fingerpaint all over the wiki, should read WP:COLOR, and maybe try to imagine how illegible their colored tables are for those with visual handicaps. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Completely trivial, with no encyclopedic value. RoadWarrior445 (talk) 23:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems like cruft to me.  Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it doesn't need an article on Wikipedia.  Anyway, no true ninja could be stopped by a mere obstacle course. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, or possibly redirect to American Ninja Warrior. Indiscriminate listcruft. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 20:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, more trivial Shad Innet (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not needed, just an indiscriminate list of unimportant things. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT. As none of these obstacles are notable, why aggregate them in an indiscriminate list? APerson (talk!) 13:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.