Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List group label strategy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 14:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

List group label strategy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sure how this "method" is notable, and how encyclopedic the method is. Appears to be a forum to advertise a method of teaching, with links to companies that offer it. P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 20:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep. Article gives multiple references to books, with page ranges clearly mentioned. This is enough to establish notability. The article does have some problems with context and is a bit howtoish, hopefully an expert can fix that. VG &#x260E; 21:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. As well as the sources in the article there are loads more found by Google Books and Google Scholar searches that show notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There seem to be sources; but the article needs some work; it is more promotional than descriptive. Like all teaching methods, there is probably criticism available, and it should be looked for. DGG (talk) 10:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.