Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2-Letter Word Squares


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

List of 2-Letter Word Squares
Computer generated list - OR, unverifiable, unencyclopaedic. I also nominate
 * List of 6-Letter Word Squares. Delete both. BlueValour 17:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam User:Yy-bo 18:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment FWIW they are verifiable (given the proper nouns) and they are not spam. That's not to say they should be kept.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment spam-style: a complete list of six letter words equals flooding the net with random data. Article belong to a group including six letter words. User:Yy-bo 18:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment "Spam" tends to be defined as Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Communication, or in Wikipedia under WP:SPAM. I think you are confusing the term with another, but cannot work out which.  It certainly fails WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information, but it is not Spam or even Spam-like Fiddle Faddle 19:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I am sorry. For me spam is what a spam filter throws away. A spam filter works by giving points upon certain criteria. Definetively the six letter word list would trigger the criteria random, computer generated data. Hence the argument spam-like. It is also possible to discuss this on user talk, not here.User:Yy-bo 14:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both and any similar. The valid article is the one that defines what word squares are.  These two (and any similar) articles are wholly irrelevant to an encyclopaedia.  Fiddle Faddle 11:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.