Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of A.D. Isidro Metapan players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

List of A.D. Isidro Metapan players

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:LISTN is not met here due to a lack of coverage of the subjects as a group. As it stands, this is an indiscriminate list of mostly non-notable people. Let&#39;srun (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Lists of people, Sports, Football, Lists,  and El Salvador. Let&#39;srun (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 14:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It desperately needs an update, but this is another misuse of the term "indiscriminate" in a list deletion discussion - there is crystal clear inclusion criteria. SportingFlyer  T · C  02:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep—Likewise falls under WP:NLIST, by my reading. It's not the individuals who are notable. It's the "group or set" at is notable as such. Anwegmann (talk) 04:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yet this list only includes a self-selected number of players, many of whom have no article themselves, and has no sources discussing these players as a group. In my opinion, it is much more appropriate to have a category for the notable players who played here. Let&#39;srun (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Which is fixable through editing, and nowhere in NLIST does it require sources to discuss the list as a group, since there are several valid reasons for creating lists. SportingFlyer  T · C  18:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Still no consensus. User:SportingFlyer, I see your remarks as a Keep vote, no? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – a category for the players from this club is enough. Svartner (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * I specifically didn't !vote keep because the article's not in good shape, but I'm not a delete. The deletion rationale is flawed - LISTN does not require a source listing the subjects as a group, and it's not indiscriminate. SportingFlyer  T · C  08:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep notable group of individuals covered by a group in reliable sources. The article needs improved, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP.  Frank   Anchor  19:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.