Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Agricultural Web Sites

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

List of Agricultural Web Sites
Delete since WP:ISNOT a web-directory which this article confesses to being in its title. I thought about slapping a speedy on this since it is tantamount to a single external link but isn't quite there. -Splash 23:49, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Zoe 23:50, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the fact that the page is important in keeping the huge amount of external links in agricultural articles manageable. Lapinmies 00:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Please note that it is considered polite and in line with Wikipedia policy to state that you are the article's author. --IByte 00:32, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator Soltak 00:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lapinmies. Kappa 00:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. The text above the links seems largely irrelevant and POV-pushing, by the way. --IByte 00:32, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Nandesuka 05:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but a couple of these sites could be added to the agriculture article, which is pretty US-centric &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 06:01, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but add new links to Agriculture. If that article does get unwieldy, there may come a time when it makes sense to split the links into a separate article. -- DS1953 07:09, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nominator. / Peter Isotalo 02:27, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a repository of external links. The article has no actual content.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:55, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. --Carnildo 05:27, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete in agreement with the nominator. Our approach to growing lists of links should not be to create pages of links, but rather to become more skilled in choosing the right links -- people come here for information, and expect to be given it.  A mammoth list of links doesn't qualify: if it's too hard to choose the right (limited number of) links, then I think the editors involved need to seek advice from others. Jwrosenzweig 08:42, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Add any useful links not in the Agriculture article to that one and delete this. Thryduulf 10:14, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT, as above. Carbonite | Talk 11:49, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. --nixie 12:33, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't Yahoo! Lite. --Calton | Talk 15:46, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.