Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Gear Terms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Air Gear. Cirt (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Air Gear Terms

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable "terms" from a manga/anime. Written in universe. No sources other then a generic link to a fan forum. Totally incomprehensible to someone who is not already a fan and familiar with these terms. Fails WP:PLOT, and WP:WAF. Ridernyc (talk) 09:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fancruft. Niteshift36 (talk) 11:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is a recreation of List of Air Gear terms which was merged to Air Gear on 9 October 2008. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect and cleanup links from other articles so that this won't get recreated again. --Farix (Talk) 14:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete & redirect not notable & in no way deserving to have its own article. More related articles doesn't mean better coverage of a subject in the case of Air gear it's ending with excessive plots, excessive redundant informations, more original research and all what's people like to call fancruft. --KrebMarkt 15:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Aside from being non-notable, it's far too in-universe. More or less excessive fancruft. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 02:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Remerge This is a request to reverse a split, not to delete. This sort of material is usually better in the main article. DGG (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Remerge and delink (if there is anything worth merging) to prevent another recreation. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plot tidbits and fictional details arranged into a glossary or sorts. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 19:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.