Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Airbus orders and deliveries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. ChrisO 22:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Airbus orders and deliveries

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be listcruft.  Bl a  st  [ improve me ] 23.06.07 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete not only a textbook case of indiscriminate list, there really is no context behind this list. Maybe merge one or two charts into Airbus though, as an example of how the company has grown. Resolute 22:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft per nom. --Bren talk 04:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 05:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This appears to be a statistical appedix to the Airbus article. It might have some merit, but I suspect these statistics are copied wholesale froma company website; if so, it will be much better for the Airbus article to cite that website as its source, leaving readers to follow the link.  I would suggest that this is thus a weak delete.  Peterkingiron 13:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note. You did not tag the article in question with a afd notice, and that is very important so that the people who have worked on the article are alerted that the age is up for deletion. I have tagged the article, and will move this nomination from June 23 to June 25 so that it can get a full and proper discussion, not only from AFD regulars, but also from people who visit the article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * My apologies. Thanks for fixing! (:  Oc t  ane  [ improve me ] 25.06.07 1834 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 09:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unnecessary list; Wikipedia would be better-served by a link to this information as a source for the Airbus article.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 09:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indiscriminate collection, indeed.  Fails WP:NOT in a bad way.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Leaning against the trend here because this list is limited, well defined, and the data is notable. But I do think the List of Boeing 737 orders and List of Boeing 787 orders pages present comparable information in a much better format. &mdash; RJH (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.