Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Akagami no Shirayukihime characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Akagami no Shirayukihime. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 09:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

List of Akagami no Shirayukihime characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:BOOK or WP:NOTE. To coverage by reliable, third-party sources could be found. See prod for main article, Akagami no Shirayukihime. Prod was disputed by an IP who simply added references to the publisher's website. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge - At the very least this does not deserve to be in a seperate article. Bensci54 (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. This AFD should have been bundled with the AFD for the article (here) as there's no sense in handling them separately, and this has no basis for existing if the parent article is deleted as nonnotable. postdlf (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge - A lot of the content really isn't that important (extremely minor characters). The main character summaries were removed from the main page regardless; now back to the way it was. Added summary content has inconsistent romanization, various grammatical & spelling errors.AnSPage (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. Character list articles are usually considered acceptable for notable fictional series.  No strong opinion regarding the possibility of trimming and merging back to the main article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 00:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.