Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of All Pipe Bands in the World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was The resulst was Delete AdamBiswanger1 19:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

List of All Pipe Bands in the World
very ambitious listcruft ccwaters 13:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Why would anyone want to delete this article? Is there a problem with being ambitious?  Grim0107 13:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment an ambition doesnt qualify for an article, facts do. (Neostinker 18:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete - I don't see a point in this list. MER-C 14:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - it is redundant of List of pipe bands which you have personally edited. Titling it "List of All Pipe Bands in the World" dooms it to falsehood, because you'll never complete it. ccwaters 14:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, redundant. yandman  14:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. --Nehwyn 14:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, yep sorry but there's no use for it. James086 14:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Storkk 14:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are dozens of small ones just in the Czech Republic, frex. Pavel Vozenilek 15:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above but not just in the czech i am sure there are dozens of these bands everywhere.(Neostinker 18:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC))
 * Delete, obviously redundant per Ccw.  Dei zio  talk 18:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.