Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ambisonic Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

List of Ambisonic Productions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Also comes off as being trivial to me. GamerPro64 23:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

No objections. My reason to create this page was that I found it to be cluttering the main article, yet didn't want to just discard the potentially valuable work of previous editors. I'm not happy with moving such a scratchpad page to my User space (particularly since I don't see myself working on it any time soon), so if it can't stay here, it will have to go, unless somebody else steps up to adopt it. --Nettings (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Are there any other articles you made in the same vein? GamerPro64  13:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Duplicates/splits from Ambisonics, which covers it better. Would be easier if the creator just nominated it for speedy deletion without going through the AfD process. Not a particularly useful search phrase, so deletion preferred over redirection. czar ♔   15:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You mean the creator as in the one who made the AfD or the one who made the article? GamerPro64  16:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Page creator is, and you're the nom. The page creator could G7 the page as the page's sole author. czar ♔   17:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, Czar's observation appears accurate. I don't strongly oppose a redirect if someone felt it necessary, but stats.grok.se doesn't leave me with a sense that there's a non-trivial link from outside of WP pointing here, and various search engines will do a fine enough job at finding our coverage without the redirect. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.