Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American Heiress episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Consensus clearly in favour of this - early and non admin closure.  Th e Su nshi ne M an  18:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

List_of_American_Heiress_episodes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Wikipedia is not a TV guide
 * Keep as a reasonable entry in the well-established structure of lists of television episodes. See WP:EPISODE. Otto4711 12:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 14:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a summery of the series. Although, not complete, the show is still currently running.
 * Keep per above comments. Bravedog 16:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, I know it's not the best reason, but there are lists of episodes of lots of other shows. Useight 22:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as there is clear precedent for articles such as this instead of trying to roll this information into the main article (and far beyond the scope of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). 23skidoo 01:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm glad to see someone brave enough to recommend the deletion of a list of episodes of a TV series. First, this type of thing is well-covered in the episode guides that are part of the show's website and the websites by fans.  Second, Wikipedia shouldn't be a TV guide; unfortunately, it is, and that's one of its less endearing qualities.  This is typical of deletion debates..."List of Japanese corporations"- bad!; "List of episodes of American Heiress"-- good! (And as a person who forgot to sign the first time, please sign your name if you're wanting to delete someone else's work... whether you agree or disagree with the article, it's not fair to the author if you remain unidentified).Mandsford 02:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.