Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Amusement Parks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep -- light darkness (talk) 17:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

List of Amusement Parks
Also the associated subpages List of Amusement Parks (A-B) and List of Amusement Parks (C-D). We have Category:Amusement parks which does the same job without the maintenance overhead. We also have Category:Water parks and Category:Theme parks, and various subcategories by location. I'd say this is redundant per those categories; I strongly suspect that it was the impossibility of maintaining such vcasts lists which led the creator to lose momentum after starting back in February. The articles have been esentially untouched since creation, and having seen the scale of the task required to complete the remaining sections from E to Z, let alone maintain the existing ones, I can quite see why. Just zis Guy you know? 17:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with User:JzG's reasoning. Batmanand | Talk 18:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Henning Makholm 22:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve, lists are just as valid as categories, and do things categories just are not capable of. Jcuk 00:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Shows locations and included red links, neither of which can be done with cateogories. Hawkestone 06:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and fix. This list is a good start, and as noted, it does things that can't be done in categories.  I suggest fixing it by:  Moving A-B to main page, reducing the subcategories to just A-B C-D E-Z, and de-wikifying E-Z until someone takes the time to add those.  George100 14:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I prefere lists over categories because much more info can be added and they are far easier to read. Would be nice if this was completed. -- JJay 12:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.