Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Animals in Planet Zoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

List of Animals in Planet Zoo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not nearly enough here to be a stand-alone list. Could be merged into Planet Zoo. echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  04:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Literally impossible to justify as a stand-alone list, and redirecting or merging to the parent article is pointless. This editor needs to read-up on Wikipedia's policies before making pages. Their other creations are just as poor. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete no indication of notability, or reversely obviously not notable. Dronebogus (talk) 13:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete or just delete as WP:GAMECRUFT. Would speedy but I Don't see any eligible tag. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I tried to speedy it as "No Content" (since the "article" is just a few links to animals), but that was denied. More speedy deletion tags for lists need to be made. Why? I Ask (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not a valid criteria since there is content. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't think that the single word "standard" and a collection of links is content, but I digress. Why? I Ask (talk) 21:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No “meaningful” content maybe? Should that be added? Possibly something like “incomprehensible” or “no context” also works. Dronebogus (talk) 13:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge to Planet Zoo - there is room in the target article. A list like this fails WP:LISTN mainly because it is not needed to provide information or assist our readers with navigation. Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:GAMECRUFT. As useless as a character and helper list for smash bros. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:06, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a highly questionably written list (similarly to numerous articles User:Jacksoncochran048484 created); unsourced, fails WP:LISTN, is gamecruft, and does not help with navigation. This list has no lead sections, but has some context or content, so with A1 and A3 out of the way I'm at regular delete.  VickKiang  (talk)  20:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment this could’ve just been PRODed Dronebogus (talk) 13:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I definitely should've just done that... sorry echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  08:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Animal. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 07:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet any of the speedy criteria, but still a pretty clear WP:SNOW delete. Incomplete and sloppy WP:GAMECRUFT article nowhere near being ready for the mainspace. Sergecross73   msg me  13:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – don't know why I'm even writing here because this is an obvious SNOW delete: no references and GAMECRUFT in its purest form. I would be against allowing this information in Planet Zoo at all, let alone in its own article. DecafPotato (talk) 00:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there's no assertion that the animals within Zoo Tycoon are talked about in any form that requires a list per LISTN, and to the degree they do it's probably game guide information out of our scope. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 16:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.